The production and delivery of food to consumers brings with it numerous, complex sustainability issues; from giant meat produces, which emit tonnes of CO2 every day, through to the logistics behind the transportation and distribution of food. To ensure alignment with the Paris Agreement goals of ‘pursuing efforts to limit global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees’[1], the carbon footprint associated with the movement of food needs to be reduced.
The intriguing mystery of cave paintings
In 1940, four teenage boys discovered a cave painting in Lascaux, France, when their dog went astray. When they looked for it, they followed their dog through the entrance of a cave, where there were at least one thousand pictures of various animals on the walls – one bull was nearly 17ft long. In shock, or because of the build-up of carbon dioxide in the cave, the boys began to dart around – they ‘went completely crazy,’ they said, and according to one of them the animals seemed to be moving. Imagine that you are these boys from Nazi-occupied France, you have travelled down some sort of rabbit hole to find yourself at the beginning of mankind and you are hallucinating a big dance of prehistoric beasts.
Are we living in an echo chamber, and how far is social media responsible?
Here at Wimbledon High, some of us share views on politics, ethics, and morality and, let’s be honest, are not exactly renowned for our collective ability to keep quiet on them. So, I feel fairly confident in saying that a lot of us have similar thoughts on ‘right’ and ‘wrong’. For example, there is a large group who are, politically, slightly left leaning. I cannot exclude myself from this group of people, nor do I wish to. However, most of my political views hugely reshaped themselves since I downloaded the popular social media app TikTok, and I’m sure that many of you have also been heavily influenced by social media; be it, like me, TikTok, or your friends reposting posts on Instagram, or Twitter.
The chilling effect of censorship
A defining feature of all authoritarian governments and ideologies, censorship is hardly a new phenomenon. Just take a cursory glance at history, and you will find countless examples of people imposing censorship as a means of thought control, often with devastating consequences. It comes as no surprise that freedom of expression is often seen as the hallmark of a civilised society – and for good reason. The suppression of dissenting opinion invariably paves the way for further abuses of human rights, and betrays the values of democracy.
Civil Discourse – an interview with Ms Kennedy
Having read Ms Kennedy’s WimLearn article on civil discourse (which is really rather good – click here to read it), and with this week marking the launch of the civil discourse programme at WHS, I thought I’d quiz our headteacher on what ‘authentic encounters between enquiring hearts and minds’ really means. We touch on teachers at WHS, culture wars, feminism, ad hominin, the state of the British press and of course, the infamous “school of woke” comment, courtesy of Giles Coren. What struck me throughout our conversation was this concept of a ‘dialogue’; that the problem is really us jumping at each other’s throats when we disagree or feel offended at something. It is this that obstructs constructive, useful and mutually respectful conversations. ‘There’s more that connects us than divides us’, as Jo Cox, head of co-curricular at WHS, reminds us at the end of this interview.



